Subject: Re: SGML declarations for subdocuments From: Matthias Clasen <clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 21:31:30 +0200 |
> > This left me with the problem of how to resolve my case, and I'll > describe this briefly here, in case anyone else finds themself in a > similar situation (or can suggest anything better). > Wouldn't the simplest solution be to not make them SUBDOC entities, but complete documents including a declaration ? If that isn't an option, you could use the annex K extensions to put a declaration even on subdoc entities. This admittedly doesn't work with current SP, but I have a patch for this which will appear in one of the next OpenJade releases. -- Matthias Clasen, Tel. 0761/203-5606 Email: clasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mathematisches Institut, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Gray | Thread | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Gray |
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Gray | Date | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Norman Gray |
Month |