Subject: Re: SGML declarations for subdocuments From: Norman Gray <norman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 09:51:31 +0100 (BST) |
Greetings, On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > This left me with the problem of how to resolve my case, and I'll > > describe this briefly here, in case anyone else finds themself in a > > similar situation (or can suggest anything better). > > > > Wouldn't the simplest solution be to not make them SUBDOC entities, > but complete documents including a declaration ? They're author-generated documents, so I need to keep them as uncluttered as possible (they already use shortrefs quite extensively, to try to keep the number of angle-brackets to a minimum!). > ... you could use the annex K extensions to put a declaration even > on subdoc entities. This admittedly doesn't work with current SP, but > I have a patch for this which will appear in one of the next OpenJade > releases. Excellent! Yet another good reason for going over to OpenJade as soon as I can budget the time.... Thanks, Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman Gray http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK norman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Matthias Clasen | Thread | Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Adam Di Carlo |
Re: SGML declarations for subdocume, Matthias Clasen | Date | Re: Formatting_the_result, Toby Speight |
Month |