Subject: May indirect flow objects nest? From: Peter Nilsson <pnidv96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 13:31:27 +0100 (CET) |
Hi, I'm designing a formatter for DSSSL and have come to this question: May the procedure passed to the general-indirect-sosofo procedure return a sosofo specifying indirect flow objects in its turn? I don'w know why anyone would do this, but it seems valid according to the standard. Anyone who can clarify on this topic? Example: is (general-indirect-sosofo p (page-number)) ... (define (p n) ... (general-indirect-sosofo q (column-number)) ...) available? Regards, /Peter Nilsson -- '(#\P . (#\e . (#\t . (#\e . (#\r))))) DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
openjade web pages, Jany Quintard | Thread | String problem, Dudley, Mark |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] OpenJade 1.3 binarie, Alexander Sieb | Date | RE: XML encoding from a DSSSL style, Pawson, David |
Month |