Subject: Re: belle page From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:27:39 +0100 (BST) |
Wroth, Mark writes: > I have never been convinced that implementing page-sequence in TeX > is as difficult as the (informed) opinion on this list would have it. > This may be because I don't _understand_ what is implied by > page-sequence I am not sure that many of us do! I am sure I dont > But this discussion causes me to wonder how much of the confusion > is generated by the design decision to base JadeTeX on LaTeX rather > than more primitive TeX definition. I don't buy that. Anything you can do in plain TeX we can use in jadetex. I don't say its easy, but we can do it, even if it means a new output routine. > I guess what I'm saying is that I think the (PDF)TeX engine is > capable of handling everything I understand of the page-sequence and > column-set needs. yes. I agree that TeX could do the job. If EITHER - the backend tells it exactly what to do in TeX language OR - the macros attempt to understand what to do from DSSSL-like language currently jadetex is predicated on the assumption that the latter method can solve all problems. I now believe that this was a mistake, and that the former route is needed. which means a butt-load of C++ programming in jade by someone who understands TeX well. sebastian DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: belle page, Wroth, Mark | Thread | Re: belle page, Matthias Clasen |
Re: belle page, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | page sizes and crop marks, Deborah Greenberg Li |
Month |