Subject: Re: Differences between backends. From: Jany Quintard <quintard.j@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 17:05:21 +0200 (CEST) |
On Wed, 31 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Jany Quintard writes: > > .../... > > but the bookmarks > > are OK, except thatI would like to see more (the sublevels too) > so put them in... the .tex file you sent had HeadingLevel attributes > on two elements only > > > stylesheet, I give a heading calculated with the depth of the <d> > > element. > your algorithm must be screwed Maybe. It seems to work in RTF, but, that is not important. I will check this afterwards. The point is : it works. > > But, there must be a difference between your PDF and mine, > > because yours opens with the bookmarks immediately visible > odd. hyperref defaults to that behaviour OK > > It seems that the problem is after the building of TeX, since you can > > process my TeX file. > > I wonder if Lorand is not having the same problem ? > > possibly. maybe you dont have the current jadetex (2.19)? Maybe I have to upgrade ? My sysop says we have 2.7. The last *instable* version we can get seems to be 2.18. Can you tell me if the 2.7 was able to process the bookmarks ? BTW, how can I have the version number. If I type something like: $(which jadetex) -version or $(which pdftex) --version I get the whole TeX's pedigree (pdfTeX (Web2C 7.3.1) 3.14159-0.13d ...) but not what I am looking for. Thanks anyway. Jany. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Differences between backends., Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: Differences between backends., Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: Bookmark generation with modula, Jany Quintard | Date | Re: Differences between backends., Sebastian Rahtz |
Month |