Subject: RE: win95 binaries From: MARK.WROTH@xxxxxxxxxxx (Wroth, Mark) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:04:30 -0700 |
hoenicka_markus <hoenicka_markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commented [...] >The problem is not in the transformation, that seems to work ok. The >problem is rather in some cryptic error messages. onsgmls will (almost?) >always print "(Invalid Message)" instead of the real error message. >OpenJade will at times produce error messages which do not reflect the >actual problem. If you need to debug a non-valid document, this is not >exactly helpful. If you work with documents that are valid anyway (e.g. if >you create them with PSGML, which increases the odds enormously to get a >valid document), you will not see this problem and the output is flawless. I've observed similar problems -- I run an old copy of Jade at home, and a new copy of OpenJade here at work. OpenJade produces very cryptic and confusing error messages compared to the old Jade. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: win95 binaries, Konovalov, Vadim | Thread | RE: win95 binaries, hoenicka_markus |
OpenJade PATCH(bugfix): extra space, Andrey Taranov | Date | RE: win95 binaries, hoenicka_markus |
Month |