RE: win95 binaries

Subject: RE: win95 binaries
From: MARK.WROTH@xxxxxxxxxxx (Wroth, Mark)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:04:30 -0700
hoenicka_markus <hoenicka_markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commented

[...]
>The problem is not in the transformation, that seems to work ok. The
>problem is rather in some cryptic error messages. onsgmls will (almost?)
>always print "(Invalid Message)" instead of the real error message.
>OpenJade will at times produce error messages which do not reflect the
>actual problem. If you need to debug a non-valid document, this is not
>exactly helpful. If you work with documents that are valid anyway (e.g. if
>you create them with PSGML, which increases the odds enormously to get a
>valid document), you will not see this problem and the output is flawless.

I've observed similar problems -- I run an old copy of Jade at home, and a new copy of OpenJade here at work.  OpenJade produces very cryptic and confusing error messages compared to the old Jade.


 DSSSList info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist


Current Thread