Subject: Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists as RTF lists? From: Ed Nixon <ed.nixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:00:47 -0400 |
"Maltby, David G" wrote: > > > > In short, my most basic requirement is to let users edit > > their documents > > using their standard authoring tool (Word), but still maintain the > > documents in a format-neutral way (DocBook). > > Although personally appalled at this concept, you may be able to buy a > solution at > http:\\www.i4i.com with their S4/TEXT product. > > Speaking from the "been-there-done-that-dept.", you are setting yourself up > for a life of pain. >
Definitely a true statement! It's too late for me, though. But for anybody thinking of getting involved in a similar project, run away!
Thanks for the pointer on S4/TEXT, looks interesting.
-- Dave
DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, David Miller | Thread | RE: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, Wroth, Mark |
Off Topic: Reading MS Word, dirish | Date | Re: DocBook -> Jade -> RTF: lists a, David Miller |
Month |