Subject: Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and TeX backend From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:45:25 +0100 |
> I agree. It could be done, if someone was prepared to get their hands > pretty dirty Which of course rules out either of us two. We have always kept our hands perfectly clean... > would you be thinking of the one that needs hacking to work with > Omega? "Hacking"? no. "Careful redesign" perhaps. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, Samuel Tardieu |
Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: (dsssl) Double-dash sign and Te, Ron Ross |
Month |