Subject: Re: (dsssl) character data and colspec From: Bob Firth <rfirth@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 15:16:55 +0000 (GMT) |
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tony Graham wrote: > XML requires that you include a system identifier instead of or as > well as the public identifier that you have already, but Jade doesn't > care if you only have a public identifier. You will, however, have > trouble with the DOCTYPE declaration if you process your file on a > true XML system instead of Jade's SGML-but-works-with-vanilla-XML > capability. Is there a way round this? Following your previous replies I have converted the files in question to true xml, using the DocBook XML dtd. However, if I include a system identifier in the DOCTYPE declaration (I used "http://docbook.org/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd"), jade complains that URLs are not supported in this release. If I don't include a system identifier, jade works fine, but as you predicted other things complain (e.g. emacs psgml mode). I guess I'm a little confused as to the purpose of the mandatory system identifier in xml. Why is it necessary when the catalog system for public identifiers is set up properly? Is it possible to force the public identifier to be used in preference to the system identifier? -- Bob Firth <rfirth@xxxxxxxxxxx> SeiScan GeoData Ltd Cheam, Surrey, UK DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) character data and cols, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: (dsssl) character data and cols, David Carlisle |
Re: (dsssl) character data and cols, David Carlisle | Date | Re: (dsssl) character data and cols, David Carlisle |
Month |