Subject: Re: (dsssl) Comparing style sheet languages From: Jany Quintard <jany.quintard@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 17:45:43 +0200 |
* Håkon Wium Lie [Thu, 27/06/2002 at 15:02 +0200] > Also sprach Jany Quintard: > > > > It just happens that stylesheet inheritance is declared using those > > > SGML tags, so in this case we must have them shown. > > > True. And it is better to show them, to help understand the structure of > > the thing. > > FYI, neither "The DSSSL Cookbook" [1] nor Daniel M. German's DSSSL > tutorial [2] show the tags. > > [1] http://csgrs6k1.uwaterloo.ca/~dmg/dsssl/tutorial/tutorial.html > [2] http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dsssldoc/cookbook/cookbook.html Yes, and it made me wonder a while when I began to write dsssl code. But the fact that they are not written does not mean that they are not there, due to the dsssl architecture. This is the tag minimization feature. Just for the fun, try this: echo "Hello Haakon" | tidy I am aware that tidy is not a validator, but, asuming that the greeting is HTML, it is able to build a correct HTML document, using this set of rules: only body is mandatory and tags can be omitted. So, you get: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> <html> <head> <meta name="generator" content= "HTML Tidy for Linux/x86 (vers 1st March 2002), see www.w3.org"> <title></title> </head> <body> balh </body> </html> Well, I am wondering if this is not a bit off-topic. Jany DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Comparing style sheet l, Håkon Wium Lie | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Comparing style sheet l, ydirson |
Re: (dsssl) Comparing style sheet l, Ian Castle | Date | RE: (dsssl) Comparing style sheet l, Didier PH Martin |
Month |