Subject: Re: (dsssl) format-number From: Jany Quintard <jany.quintard@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:00:20 +0200 |
* Jany Quintard [Thu, 24/04/2003 at 11:33 +0200] > * tmcd@xxxxxxxxx [Wed, 23/04/2003 at 15:51 -0400] > > Is there any reason to choose between > > (format-number N "1") > > and > > (number->string N) > > ? > > I always assumed that "format-number" was designed to transform exact > numbers, as for lists or such things. > after reading the spec (8.5.7.24. Number to String Conversion), > I see there seems to be no reason for this. I stopped too soon. The format-number-list is said to work on a list of *integers*. So format-number is probably designed to work on "ordinal" numbers. Jany DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) Choices, choices, Jany Quintard | Thread | Re: (dsssl) Choices, choices, tmcd |
Re: (dsssl) Choices, choices, Jany Quintard | Date | Re: (dsssl) Choices, choices, tmcd |
Month |