Subject: Re: (dsssl) ATA 100 SGML From: Jany Quintard <jany.quintard@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:35:38 +0200 |
* Tim McDaniel [Fri, 25/04/2003 at 01:13 -0500] > On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Ian Castle <ian.castle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I would recommend using openjade rather than jade > > Why? IIRC, Openjade is the follower of jade after version 1.2.1 The development of jade has been taken over by a team of volunteers. >From version 1.3, Jade is called OpenJade. It has then some improvements and bug fixes. I use: openjade:I: "OpenJade" version "1.4devel" openjade:I: "OpenSP" version "1.5pre6" These are not "stable" versions but work very fine and I da=on't have any problems. > > A slightly different approach would be to use openjade (opensp) to > > convert your SGML to XML (osx is the tool - part of openjade up to > > 1.3.1, distributed with OpenSP 1.5 which is the most recent version) > > What is "osx" and what is "OpenSP"? OpenSP is Open SP (SGML Parser). SP is the base of Jade. o(pens)sx is an SGML to XML converter. The o stands for "open". See: http://jclark.com/sp/index.htm and http://openjade.sourceforge.net/ All these tools have a very consistent interface and use the same base (Open)SP. Jany DSSSList info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/dsssl/dssslist
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: (dsssl) ATA 100 SGML, Tim McDaniel | Thread | (dsssl) Re: ATA 100 SGML, Karl Eichwalder |
Re: (dsssl) ATA 100 SGML, Tim McDaniel | Date | Re: (dsssl) ATA 100 SGML, tmcd |
Month |