Subject: [jats-list] <bio>: Contained in <contrib> or in <back> - which is better? From: Bendte Fagge <bfagge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:49:07 -0500 |
Hi, I am fairly new to this list and also fairly new to full-text XML (many of our journal titles are moving to full-text XML/HTML display this year). Our online vendor does not provide great support for display of the <bio> element. Our vendor suggested that we use the element <author-notes>, but I feel that the content we want to place in <bio> fits the definition of the <bio> element better than the <author-notes> element. (We mainly publish humanities journals that contain author bios.) So, our vendor suggested that we place the <bio> tag within <back>. However, it seems like it would be best to keep the <bio> element within <contrib>, especially for multiple authors. If we do end up placing <bio> within <back>, I'm wondering if it would be wise to use the id and rid attributes to connect a <contrib> to a <bio> since we often have multiple contributors. I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this and what advice you might have about making tagging decisions. Thanks, Bendte *** Bendte Fagge Production Coordinator Duke University Press Journals 905 West Main Street, Suite 18B Durham, NC 27701 email: bfagge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx phone: (919) 687-3674 fax: (919) 688-3524 http://www.dukeupress.edu <http://www.dukeupress.edu/>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Thread | Re: [jats-list] <bio>: Contained in, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | |
Date | Re: [jats-list] <bio>: Contained in, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | |
Month |