Subject: Re: [jats-list] citation "year" with suffix From: Bruce Rosenblum <bruce@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:03:02 -0500 |
Hi Alf,
This looks like appropriate markup for the citation to me. The @iso-8601-date attribute was intended across the elements it's used on to be a processable date format. It is certainly most useful on the date-level elements, but this is a great example of why it is needed on <year>.
Whether your processors use the attribute or just strip the non-numeric characters from <year> to do any citation lookups (like everyone has had to do until this attribute was added) will be up to you.
Jeff
On 2/25/13 10:28 AM, "Alf Eaton" <eaton.alf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>When marking up reference lists that use "Author, Year" format for >inline citations - so the year has an alphanumeric suffix if more than >one cited article has the same author surname and year - would this be >appropriate markup for the citation?: > >==== ><ref id="ref-2"> > <element-citation publication-type="journal"> > <person-group person-group-type="author"> > <name> > <surname>Wedel</surname> > <given-names>MJ</given-names> > </name> > </person-group> > <article-title>What pneumaticity tells us about >prosauropods</article-title> > <volume>1</volume> > <year iso-8601-date="2007">2007b</year> > <fpage>1</fpage> > </element-citation> ></ref> >==== > >There are two examples in >http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.0/?elem=year that use >@iso-8601-date on <year>, but they both just repeat the information in >the text content; I'm assuming this attribute was intended for cases >where the text contains something other than the 4-digit year? > >Thanks, >Alf
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] citation "year" wit, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Thread | Re: [jats-list] citation "year" wit, Alf Eaton |
Re: [jats-list] citation "year" wit, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Date | Re: [jats-list] citation "year" wit, Alf Eaton |
Month |