Subject: Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a canonical way to group multiple appendices and a glossary under a single 'Appendix' heading? From: Debbie Lapeyre <dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:58:14 -0400 |
Wendell-- I too, think Gerrit's "clumsy" model looks quite acceptable. What you say SEEMS logical, that the content of a book part should be in its body, but, in fact, the elements <app>, <index>, and <glossary> can only occur within back matter. The <book-part> model goes like this: book-part book-part-meta? front-matter? body? (para-level-stuff including table and figure and stuff like that but NOT including index or glossary or app)* sec* (book-part | xi:include)* back? label? title*, (ack | app | app-group | bio | dedication | floats-group | fn-group | glossary | index | index-group | notes | ref-list | sec | sig-block | toc | toc-group)+ So the <book-part> model as given by Gerrit makes perfect sense. If Gerrit had not wanted the "Appendix" book part to be at the same hierarchical level as the Index, the <title> element of the <back> could have been used. It seems to me that this is the JATS model accommodating some fairly unusual structures indeed, and doing it acceptably. Gerrit does not have to rearrange his content, or call any component something it is not. The thing with an 'Appendix' title is a book part, and has inside it what he said it does. That is JATS being flexible, not abusive. --Debbie ================================================================ Deborah A Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA) Suite 207 Fax: 301-315-8385 Rockville, MD 20850 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron ================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Wendell Piez |
Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Wendell Piez | Date | Re: [jats-list] BITS: Is there a ca, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- |
Month |