Subject: Re: [jats-list] Todays G+ discussions From: "Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 08:16:29 -0000 |
On 22 October 2014 22:01, Maloney, Christopher (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] maloneyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Regarding schema.org, Ibm not sure what you have in mind. Therebs a lot > > of overlap between the types of metadata defined by schema.org and JATS. > > Are you thinking that we should look for a way to generically embed > > schema.org into JATS documents? Or just that we reuse the same property > > names and so forth whenever possible? I'm assuming you will select a restricted set of terms to facilitate machine searching? I'm suggesting the schema.org terms are well researched and agreed. If you want to add to your set then there is a rich base from which to select. Shared names wherever possible would seem to be advantageous? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] Todays G+ discussio, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Thread | Re: [jats-list] Todays G+ discussio, Maloney, Christopher |
Re: [jats-list] Todays G+ discussio, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Date | Re: [jats-list] Todays G+ discussio, Dave Pawson dave.paw |
Month |