Re: [jats-list] Related objects inside sec-meta

["Mark Donoghue m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Wendell,

Could you do something like:

<related-object link-type="http://purl.org/dc/terms/hasPart"; source-id="
https://example.com/document-that-includes"/>

Inside of a sec or app?

Best,
Mark

- -- --- ----- -------- -------------
Mark Donoghue
IEEE Publishing Technology
(732) 562-6045
m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx

IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Using BITS, I have a defined relationship between fragments of XML at
> the sec level (could also be an app) and a set of external objects.
> (In this case they are items in a kind of DITA-map-like thing, which
> allocates contents of the XML fragments into larger combinations that
> do not necessarily correspond to the arrangement of the sources.)
>
> I'm thinking about inserting a related-object into the XML (sec or app
> as the case may be), which seems like it could sorta be for this, and
> sec-meta, which is valid in either of sec or app. But related-object
> is not valid directly inside sec-meta.
>
> Is my solution to sneak the related-object in somehow, to extend the
> DTD to permit what I want, or to use a different element to express
> this relation? BITS 1.0 sec-meta has only
>
> ((contrib-group)*, (abstract)*, (kwd-group)*, permissions?)
>
> which doesn't offer up anything obvious for "identifier of some other
> publication, which includes/calls this section".
>
> Ideas?
>
> Thanks! Wendell
>
>
> --
> Wendell Piez | http://www.wendellpiez.com
> XML | XSLT | electronic publishing
> Eat Your Vegetables
> _____oo_________o_o___ooooo____ooooooo_^