Re: [jats-list] How to tag author contributions (JATS 1.*, archiving)

Subject: Re: [jats-list] How to tag author contributions (JATS 1.*, archiving)
From: "Kevin Hawkins kevin.s.hawkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:06:11 -0000
I can't speak to the choice of these approaches, but I'd like to suggest that in giving the various types of contributions, you draw from this recently developed taxonomy:

http://credit.casrai.org/

--Kevin

On 7/23/15 11:00 AM, Mary Seligy mary.seligy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi All

I did look through the list archives for an answer on this first, but didn't find one. Apologies in advance in case it is there and I've just missed it.

For an upcoming new journal, we are going to be capturing each author's contribution(s) to the work. By 'contribution', I mean things like 'conception and design of experiments', 'analysis and interpretation of data', etc.

I was looking at the tag library documentation, and I see a few possible ways of tagging contributions, but I don't see anything that, to me, clearly says 'do it this way'. Here are the three most reasonable ways I can see:

1. Use <author-comment> in <contrib>, with @content-type="contribution"

2. Use a footnote on each author and contain within <author-notes>, with @fn-type="contribution"

3. Use <role> in <contrib>, with @content-type="contribution"

What say you all? Is one of the above more tempting than any of the others, or is there some fourth thing that would be best?

Thanks very much,

Mary


Mary Seligy Business Analyst, IT Canadian Science Publishing 65 Auriga Drive, Suite 203, Ottawa, ON K2E 7W6 T: 613-656-9846 ext.225 F: 613-656-9838 Journals | Website | Facebook | @cdnsciencepub | LinkedIn | CSP Weekly Review | The CSP Blog

Current Thread