Subject: [jats-list] Differences between JATS, BITS 1.0 and BITS 2.0 From: "franziska.buehring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:01:28 -0000 |
Dear all, I was wondering why there are specific differences within the JATS family, just two examples, that make my life more complicated: 7 Changing <page-count> to <book-page-count> from BITS 1.0 to BITS 2.0? It doesn't make sense for book-parts anymore (but is allowed there). 7 "Type"-Attributes for <pub-date>: it has been @pub-type for a while (and is still valid for JATS), but has been changed to @publication-format for BITS (1.0 and 2.0). I know @publication-format is now available for JATS too, but it makes standardization more complicated. Is there any reason for this? Thanks in advance, Franziska Franziska B|hring Senior Manager eProducts and Standards DE GRUYTER T +49 (0)30.260 05-202 franziska.buehring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:franziska.buehring@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> P Please consider the environment before printing.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [jats-list] is element-citation, Beck, Jeff (NIH/NLM/ | Thread | Re: [jats-list] Differences between, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Re: [jats-list] is element-citation, dal dalapeyre@xxxxxx | Date | Re: [jats-list] Differences between, Tommie Usdin btusdin |
Month |