Subject: Re: [jats-list] 2D Figures and their Interactive Versions From: "dal dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:37:01 -0000 |
Hi Davidb You are describing a situation that <alternatives> was designed to handle. We envisioned <alternatives> as containing (for example): - a graphic (low-res, black and white); - same graphic (high-res, color); - an accessible version where someone describes the graphic; - a media version, of which the graphic is but one frame (watch the movie of the reaction); - an interactive version (plug your materials into the reaction and see what happens) Now, this puts a lot of pressure on the receiving applications to know what to do based on the device doing the asking, or the protocols, or user preference, or whatever. Therefore many of your ways might work, and might be more practical. But the dream was <alternatives>. bDebbie > On Dec 21, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Haber, David dhaber@xxxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > We have authors starting to submit interactive graphics created using Jupyter notebooks. The notebooks allow for manipulation by the user in various ways, much like the various pdb viewers out there. > > The issue we are facing as it relates to encoding these objects in the JATS is that we will have two versions of these graphics, the flat 2D version and the richer interactive version. > > It seems like there are a few different ways we could tag the material: > > 1. Using <alternatives> to wrap <graphic> and <media> tags within a fig element > 2. Grouping the two versions of the graphics within a <fig-group> (I believe elife does something like this) > 3. Or simply treating the interactive version as supplementary-material > 4. Maybe some fourth way... > > In the end, perhaps the decision on how to tag this material will be determined by a combination of the online host and how we as a society want to view this content, but what we were wondering is if anybody else has come up with a good way to deal with an interactive versions of a graphic that is not necessarily supplemental to the article content? > > And I apologize in advance if this isn't quite the right forum for this sort of discussion. > > Thanks. > > DH > > David Haber | Digital Content Specialist > American Society for Microbiology > 1752 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 > ================================================================ Deborah A Lapeyre mailto:dalapeyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301-315-9631 (USA) Suite 207 Fax: 301-315-8385 Rockville, MD 20850 ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: Consultancy for XML, XSLT, and Schematron ================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[jats-list] 2D Figures and their In, Haber, David dhaber@ | Thread | |
[jats-list] 2D Figures and their In, Haber, David dhaber@ | Date | |
Month |