Re: [jats-list] JATS 1.2 Publishing vs CrossRef: single name tagging

Subject: Re: [jats-list] JATS 1.2 Publishing vs CrossRef: single name tagging
From: "Alf Eaton eaton.alf@xxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:29:15 -0000
In case it's useful, my original question referred to below was for this
article:
https://peerj.com/articles/196.xml

We ended up using this markup:

<name name-style="given-only">
<given-names>b&</given-names>
</name>

Which ended up in various places downstream:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24281688
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24281688/
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pmc&id=3817583&r
etmode=xml

I see that the same author has another paper where the publisher chose to
use name + surname, so it seems that either approach "works" - it's up to
you which you find most semantically correct for the author's name (and
suggests that it would be useful for JATS to have a tag or attribute which
says that a name really is a mononym).
https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi?db=pmc&id=4379979&r
etmode=xml

Alf

On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 at 10:11, matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx
matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (Further to this, I did find
>
https://www.biglist.com/lists/lists.mulberrytech.com/jats-list/archives/20131
0/msg00027.html,
> which addresses the JATS end, so maybe since it's been discussed before I
> should address the question to Crossref.)
>
>
>
>
> Matt Broadhead | matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx | +44 (0)7866 627085
>
>
> On Tuesday, 26 November 2019, 09:48:52 GMT, matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx
> matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi there
>
> I'm just trying to get my head around best practice for people with single
> names (as is found in some South/Southeast Asian cultures).
>
> From https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/:
>
> *Best Practice:* There is no single style that best handles all single
> (one-part) names. Tibetan, Indian, and Burmese single names *that are not
> surnames* may be tagged as <given-names>
>
<https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/given-names.html
>;
> there is no need to commit the tag abuse of calling the given name a
> surname. Most westernized single names (bPeleb, bPrinceb,
bBabyfaceb,
> bAztekb) are more likely to be retrieved properly if they are tagged as
> <surname>
> <https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/surname.html>
> s.
>
> But from Crossref:
>
> The surname of an author or editor. The surname, combined with given_name,
forms the name of an author or editor. Whenever possible, the given name
should not be included in the surname element. In cases where the given name
is not clear, as may happen with non-Western names or some societies in which
surnames are not distinguished, you may place the entire name in surname
>
>
> (This has come up because our platform flagged up some missing surnames when
depositing content.)
>
>
> I'd be grateful for insight.
>
>
> Yours
>
>
> Matt Broadhead
> European Respiratory Society
>
> Matt Broadhead | matt_g_broadhead@xxxxxxxxx | +44 (0)7866 627085
> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/2651086> (by
> email)
> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/216958> (by
> email <>)

Current Thread