Re: [jats-list] Tagging a video introduction

Subject: Re: [jats-list] Tagging a video introduction
From: "Nikos Markantonatos nikos@xxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 08:12:37 -0000
Hello Sasha.

In my view, this is an abstract of some sort, since it is all about a summary of the findings in the article. The fact that it is not peer reviewed does not make it less of an abstract. The distinction between this and the regular peer-reviewed abstract(s) is up to the @abstract-type to be made. Whether you mark this video intro as an @abstract-type="graphical", or as @abstract-type="video", or as @abstract-type="video-introduction", or as anything along these lines is probably mostly up to you.

Nikos

On 4/1/20 11:07 PM, Alexander Schwarzman aschwarzman@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello:

Does anyone have an opinion on the most appropriate markup for a short
video, where the authors introduce their paper and briefly describe
their findings?

Because this video is (1) not peer-reviewed and (2) may have different
preservation requirements than the the peer-reviewed portion of the
paper, I am a bit reluctant to treat such a video as an abstract of
the "graphical" @abstract-type.

On the other hand, such a video doesn't seem to quite fit the notion
of <supplementary-material>.

Any suggestions?

Thank you,
--Sasha

Alexander ('Sasha') Schwarzman, Content Technology Architect
phone: +1.202.416.1979 | e-mail: aschwarzman@xxxxxxx
The Optical Society (OSA)
2010 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20036 USA
www.osa.org




--
Confidentiality Notice: This email and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contain information that may be confidential and/or legally privileged. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this communication by someone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.


Current Thread