Re: [jats-list] NISO ALI adoption

Subject: Re: [jats-list] NISO ALI adoption
From: "Armin Günther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 14:02:23 -0000
Thank you Mark! It is good to know that ALI is actually used in other
systems. I was uncertain if there is any support for ALI at all.

Best wishes
Armin



Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr.
PsychOpen, Managing Editor

www.leibniz-psychology.org
ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie
ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology
UniversitC$tsring 15
D-54296 Trier - Germany
Tel.: +49b651b201-2055
www.psychopen.eu


Am Di., 12. Jan. 2021 um 16:32 Uhr schrieb Mark Donoghue m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx
<jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi Armin,
>
> My understanding of the documentation is to avoid this when using ALI:
>
>   <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/";>
>     <ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/";>
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
>   </license>
>
> I don't know why exactly -- probably because it's redundant and therefore
> inelegant :-)
>
> Using ALI would be a good choice to indicate licenses that have a URI
> because ALI is used in other systems i.e.: Crossref and CHORUS.
>
> Regards,
> Mark
> - -- --- ----- -------- -------------
> Mark Donoghue
> IEEE
> (732) 562-6045
> m.donoghue@xxxxxxxx
>
> IEEE - Advancing Technology for Humanity
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 3:39 AM Armin GC<nther ague@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <jats-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am thinking about whether we should use NISO ALI with JATS, especially
>> for referencing to the public license (CC BY) of articles. I found this
>> recommendation in the JATS documentation:
>>
>> JATS best practice is to omit the @xlink:href attribute from <license> if
>>> a NISO ALI ali:license_ref> is used.
>>
>> see:
>>
https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/tag-library/1.2/element/ali-license_ref.h
tml
>>
>> However, I am not sure about the "if" part of this recommendation: Is
>> it advisable (or when is it advisable) to use NISO ALI (
>> https://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0) ? My impression is that NISO ALI
>> until now is not widely adopted/supported.
>>
>> Any thoughts on this? Thanks!
>>
>> Armin
>>
>>
>>
>> Armin GC<nther, Prof. Dr.
>> PsychOpen, Managing Editor
>>
>> www.leibniz-psychology.org
>> ZPID - Leibniz-Institut fC<r Psychologie
>> ZPID - Leibniz Institute for Psychology
>> UniversitC$tsring 15
>> D-54296 Trier - Germany
>> Tel.: +49b651b201-2055
>> www.psychopen.eu
>> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
>> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/253780> (by
>> email)
>>
> JATS-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/JATS/JATS-List/>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/jats-list/163663> (by
> email <>)

Current Thread