Hi, all!
I cannot find in STS support for expressing BNF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus%E2%80%93Naur_form content semantically.
And I cannot see any STS construct for ##other that would allow me to
incorporate another XML vocabulary.
Has anyone already created a semantic vocabulary for use in named
content (I'm thinking styled content is in appropriate from the get
go) for BNF components?
Perhaps, some other approach has been used before by someone here?
I'm trying to help a committee that uses BNF extensively, and in
their authoring it is in a structured vocabulary. With an approach in
STS I can convert their authored instances into schema-valid STS and
go from there.
I don't wish to reinvent the wheel if someone already has found a way
to express BNF in STS and are willing to share.
If no-one has done so, I could take a stab at it.
So, looking for a pattern to follow, has any group "standardized"
their <named-content> content-type= vocabulary in a way that avoids
accidental re-use? I would like my use of named-content to be
familiar to STS users who already might have seen other named-content use.
So far from my clients, named-content has been very ad-hoc. As are
the examples in the STS documentation. And I'm not saying that is
"bad" ... but if there is a pattern out there in the wild being
re-used, I would like to re-use the pattern in creating my own vocabulary.
Thank you for any thoughts!
. . . . . . Ken
--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/j/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) |
Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |