Subject: RE: XSL Discussion From: "L. John Junod" <junod@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 12:33:42 -0500 |
I agree that in order to have a DTD for XSL we cannot know all the ELEMENTS so we therefore use <element type= -and- <target-element type= Why do you use ATTRIBUTE "type" instead of ATTRIBUTE "element" I guess because it is shorter and avoids <element element= If this is the case why don't we just use ATTRIBUTE "e" And then we would have <element e= <target-element e= which is even shorter or use ATTRIBUTE "name" So that we would have <element name= <target-element name= which certainly reads more like what is going on (or is the intention to reserve "name" for <attributes>?) John Junod Junod@xxxxxxxxxxx
<<application/ms-tnef>>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: XSL Discussion, David Megginson | Thread | RE: XSL Discussion, Fabio Vitali |
syntax of XSL Patterns [was Re: XSL, Paul Grosso | Date | XSL Erratta, L. John Junod |
Month |