Re: XSL Erratta

Subject: Re: XSL Erratta
From: Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 14:12:07 -0500
At 12:57 1998 02 23 -0500, L. John Junod wrote:
>I think I found an obvious typo in the sample of Appendix A, 
>If you go to the end of the sample and step backwards you pass the <style-rule> for BLOCKQUOTE and the <style-rule> for ADDRESS and then you hit "<rule>"  for PRE, TT, CODE, KBD, and SAMP.
>
>Question: Isn't this element supposed to be <style-rule> instead of <rule>?  
>The 5th <rule> from the top already took care of the rule portion of things.
>

You are correct.  This has already been noted by the working group,
but thanks for your careful reading.

paul


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread
  • XSL Erratta
    • L. John Junod - Mon, 23 Feb 1998 12:57:41 -0500
      • <Possible follow-ups>
      • Paul Grosso - Mon, 23 Feb 1998 14:12:07 -0500 <=