Subject: Re: XSL Erratta From: Paul Grosso <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 14:12:07 -0500 |
At 12:57 1998 02 23 -0500, L. John Junod wrote: >I think I found an obvious typo in the sample of Appendix A, >If you go to the end of the sample and step backwards you pass the <style-rule> for BLOCKQUOTE and the <style-rule> for ADDRESS and then you hit "<rule>" for PRE, TT, CODE, KBD, and SAMP. > >Question: Isn't this element supposed to be <style-rule> instead of <rule>? >The 5th <rule> from the top already took care of the rule portion of things. > You are correct. This has already been noted by the working group, but thanks for your careful reading. paul XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL Erratta, L. John Junod | Thread | More XSL Discussion, Jeremie Miller |
XSL Erratta, L. John Junod | Date | More XSL Discussion, Jeremie Miller |
Month |