Subject: Re: Style vs. transformation From: Darrin Smart <darrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 05 Mar 1998 08:58:40 +1100 |
Tony Stewart wrote: > I'll admit that if > we must choose just one escape then JavaScript is a pretty good choice > (perhaps the best), but it's not a panacea and there's no reason to > handcuff ourselves to just one. Especially considering how quickly > things change. Do we really want to rewrite the standard next year when > something better than JavaScript comes along? Are there any free implementations of JavaScript (with source)? (Programming language junkies might check out http://www.zeta.org.au/~atrn/ici/Default.html, as a possible alternative) - Darrin XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Style vs. transformation, Tony Stewart | Thread | Re: Style vs. transformation, Paul Prescod |
Re: Style vs. transformation, Paul Prescod | Date | RE: Style vs. transformation, Reynolds, Gregg |
Month |