Subject: Re: RTF Processor From: David Megginson <ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 08:17:00 -0400 |
Paul Prescod writes: > RTF functionality from XSL would indeed be useful. XSL is designed > to be a conceptual subset of DSSSL. Thus if you are looking to > extend it to handle more print-oriented flow objects, I think it is > most appropriate that you use the DSSSL flow objects which are the > product of years of thought and experience and seem very complete > and well considered to me. The biggest problem with the DSSSL flow object classes is that there is no middle ground between the trivial simple-page-sequence and the extremely complex page-sequence/page-model and column-set-sequence/column-set-model. All the best, David -- David Megginson ak117@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: RTF Processor, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: RTF Processor, Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: Why Core Flow Objects, Paul Prescod | Date | Re: RTF Processor, Mark_Overton |
Month |