Subject: Re: CSS Flow Objects in XSL [WAS: RE: HTML Flow objects that span rules] From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 17:11:46 -0400 |
Mark_Overton@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I think it comes down to this. Different media will always have different > logical structures. I don't think that anybody disagrees. DSSSL has separate (but overlapping) sets of flow objects for print and online. XSL is only designed for online (right now), and thus does not yet. I also pointed out that separate flow objects for aural output would also be useful at some point. The only reason I disagreed with you is because you used the specific example of tables of contents and RTF. RTF is not a medium and tables of contents are constructed in pretty much the same way for print and online anyhow. Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "Perpetually obsolescing and thus losing all data and programs every 10 years (the current pattern) is no way to run an information economy or a civilization." - Stewart Brand, founder of the Whole Earth Catalog http://www.wired.com/news/news/culture/story/10124.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: CSS Flow Objects in XSL [WAS: R, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: CSS Flow Objects in XSL [WAS: R, Mark_Overton |
Re: CSS Flow Objects in XSL [WAS: R, Mark_Overton | Date | using xslj and jade to produce html, Kent Fitch |
Month |