Subject: Re: Language choice (was: Re: Interactive XML) From: Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 01 Jul 1998 20:15:32 +0200 |
>>>>> Brandon Ibach <bibach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So, given how well this seems to work, why isn't the XSL WG just > defining an alternate syntax for DSSSL? It isn't? Oops, I must've missed something there... > Why are they reinventing the functionality that DSSSL already > provides? (If I'm misinterpreting what the WG is doing, please > let me know...) Well, it seems that XSL allows a more declarative specification on what rules to apply. I think. But then, I know next to nothing about DSSSL and only a little bit about XSL. I wish some guru would jump in and enlighten me :-) kai -- You ate somebody? -- Just a leg. -- That's terrible! -- Not with mustard. (Terry Pratchett: Interesting Times) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Brandon Ibach | Thread | Re: How to do XML to XML translatio, Stefan Trcek |
Re: Language choice (was: Re: Inter, Brandon Ibach | Date | Re: Defining widget flow objects (w, Brandon Ibach |
Month |