Subject: Re: Modes (or lack thereof) From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 21:02:43 +0700 |
Mark_Overton@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Why is the "mode" capability missing from the new spec. > What am I missing? In 2.7.1 the WD says: Issue (modes): How should the functionality of DSSSL modes be provided? Should nested template rules be used for this? Is there a way of getting source elements to appear in multiple places in the output that can be implemented in a single pass? In other words the WG is fully aware we need the functionality of modes but hasn't yet reached consensus on the right way to provide it. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Modes (or lack thereof), Mark_Overton | Thread | Re: Modes (or lack thereof), Chris Lilley |
Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can, Patrice Bonhomme | Date | Re: New/old pattern syntax, why can, Richard Lander |
Month |