Subject: Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variations on the XML syntax From: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry S. Thompson) Date: 25 Aug 1998 12:05:09 +0100 |
"Pawson, David" <DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > For the cognoscenti, what is the 'official' way to proffer suggestions. > I know James and Henry are listening here, but how should Scott > forward such to the powers that be? Many others from the WG listen, but there's always an 'official' listener (a rotating task within the WG) who is responsible for reading this list and pulling together a regular summary of issues raised, suggestions made, etc. and forwarding that to the WG mailing list. Members of W3C can of course see this and all other WG mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/ So the bottom line: posting to xsl-list is the public way to comment on the draft. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Pawson, David | Thread | Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Daniel Glazman |
First beta release of a Java XSL Pr, Jeremy CALLES | Date | Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Scott Lawton |
Month |