Subject: FOs for Tree Control From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1998 14:39:58 +0800 |
[initial question: do we call FOs: formatting objects or flow objects?] Has any consideration been given to including some sort of tree control FO? It doesn't really work on paper, but I can imagine that online there would be a number of element types that would best be expressed as a tree control. <!ELEMENT fo:tree (fo:treenode+)> <!ELEMENT fo:treenode %foAllSub;)> with fo:treenode having attributes relating to node icon, collapsibility, etc. What do people think? James -- James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx Perth, Western Australia XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
how can I test current element type, Dave Carlson | Thread | EcmaScript, gone?, Pawson, David |
how can I test current element type, Dave Carlson | Date | Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Chris von See |
Month |