Subject: Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variations on the XML syntax From: Andy Dent <dent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 10:53:00 +0800 |
At 9:16 AM +0800 27/8/98, Chris von See wrote: >My past personal experience has been that there isn't necessarily a >divergence between simplicity and power I agree. I've had several years experience with code generators, and designing application framework API's. In general, an API that's clean and easy to code to by hand has two important benefits that lead to much quicker turnaround in developing the tools. - it simplifies the complexity of the generator - it is VASTLY easier to debug the output of the generator. I would want to see a VERY convincing argument that justified increased complexity in XSL. I'm already struggling a little bit in coming to terms with the model (admittedly I've given myself a very short time-frame in which to do so). Andy Dent, Software Designer, A.D. Software, Western Australia OOFILE - Database, Reports, Graphs, GUI for c++ on Mac, Unix & Windows PP2MFC - PowerPlant->MFC portability http://www.highway1.com.au/adsoftware/crossplatform.html XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Chris von See | Thread | Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Scott Lawton |
Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Chris von See | Date | Re: 2.6 patterns: let's try variati, Andy Dent |
Month |