Subject: Re: EcmaScript, gone? From: "James Tauber" <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:16:21 +0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: Francois Belanger <francois@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Paul Prescod wrote on 28/08/98 00:51: > >>As you probably >>know, there is a stylesheet-related concept called a "behaviour sheet." > >I don't know about "behaviour sheet", but the idea seems quite >interesting and does neatly separate declaration and code. True many HTML >pages with JavaScript are a mess to read. There is a distinction to be drawn between scripts that describe the behaviour of certain elements at the client end (how a header responds to a mouseover event) with procedural parts of an XSL stylesheet (section numbering). The ECMAScript part of XSL-NOTE was for the latter. The term "behaviour sheets" I've always taken to mean the former. James -- James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.jtauber.com/ Lecturer and Associate Researcher Electronic Commerce Network ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/ Curtin Business School ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/ Perth, Western Australia ( http://www.schema.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: EcmaScript, gone?, Hakon Lie | Thread | Re: Some questions regarding XML/ED, Martin Bryan |
Re: EcmaScript, gone?, Hakon Lie | Date | [no subject], James Tauber |
Month |