I've already expressed my desire for a separate tree addressing language
usable by both XSL and XLink.
It occurs to me that maybe the formatting objects could be separate too.
I would actually like XSL to consist of three *separate* things:
1. Pattern Language for Tree Addressing
2. DTD and Specification of Formatting Objects
3. Specification for Stylesheets themselves, Tree Transforms, etc.
2 and 3 already use separate namespaces.
James
--
James Tauber / jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.jtauber.com/
Lecturer and Associate Researcher
Electronic Commerce Network ( http://www.xmlinfo.com/
Curtin Business School ( http://www.xmlsoftware.com/
Perth, Western Australia ( http://www.schema.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list