Subject: Re: [2.7.7] : Direct Processing From: James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 16:04:47 +0700 |
G. Ken Holman wrote: > If not, is the "for-each" considered just an alternative representation > of the same or is there somehow some performance difference? xsl:for-each allows you to process elements differently in different places (like DSSSL modes). In the current draft it provides functionality that can't always be replaced by process. James XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[2.7.7] : Direct Processing, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [2.7.8] : Numbering in the Source T, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [2.6.3] : Anchors - use of NCNa, James Clark | Date | Re: [2.7.8] : Numbering in the Sour, James Clark |
Month |