Subject: Re: multiple Formatting namespaces. From: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Henry S. Thompson) Date: 14 Sep 1998 16:39:31 +0100 |
Frank Beckman and James Tauber raise the question of multiple result namespaces. At present there is no provision for the result tree to have more than one namespace prefix. For non-formatting-object result trees, I see no reason in principle why this could not be possible. The recommendation would have to change to make result-ns be NMTOKENS instead of NMTOKEN. BUT, I don't think mixing anything with the formatting objects defined in the recommendation is a good idea. Or rather, the only safe place for this is inside an fo:graphic with inline='true' and the graphic-notation-id set appropriately. This is my interpretation of that bit of the recommendation, not necessarily the editor's intent. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: multiple Formatting namespaces., James Tauber | Thread | Re: multiple Formatting namespaces., James Tauber |
?indent-result, Frank Boumphrey | Date | Re: Wrapping groups, Chris Maden |
Month |