Subject: Re: XSL: xt question From: alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: 18 Sep 1998 09:14:32 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 09:14:32 -0700 (PDT) |
> I too discovered that when I tried to do <HR/> ... I ended up doing <HR > width="100%"> instead and that worked. > > So, just now I tried <BR/> and agree with you Netscape ignores it, so I > created <BR bogus="bogus"/> and this version of the BR command is > respected by Netscape (since it ignores bogus attribute values). Hmmm, I wouldn't do it this way because you are putting the hacks into your stylesheet. Once some implementation fixes this issue or browsers accept the empty tag syntax you would have to change your stylesheet. I would post-process the XML produced to change empty tag syntax for HTML. It is a really easy perl script to write. ============================================================================= R. Alexander Milowski alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (650) 858-4985 v|e|o MOS | sed s/SG/X/g > DYX XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: XSL: xt question, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: XSL: xt question, alex |
Re: XSL: xt question, alex | Date | indent-start: absolute or relative?, James Tauber |
Month |