Subject: Re: Beginners question: Koala XSL-Engine and <xsl:process select> From: keshlam@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 12:57:46 -0500 |
Re XSL and PI's: As noted, they're XML's "portable nonportable extension mechanism", and if XSL it going to be used with systems that Really Want their own PIs I think XSL is going to have to be able to generate them... which probably means it should also be able to process them. I don't think that this significantly complicates learning XSL, assuming that a decent syntax can be found to express it in the pattern language -- users who don't need this feature would simply ignore it. It does slightly impact cost of implementation, but if it's "cheap" -- which looks likely -- I'd say go with it. ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research Unless stated otherwise, all opinions are solely those of the author. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Beginners question: Koala XSL-E, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: Beginners question: Koala XSL-E, keshlam |
Re: Doubts regarding XSL and DOM, Amit Rekhi | Date | Re: Doubts regarding XSL and DOM, keshlam |
Month |