Subject: RE: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Microsoft extensions) From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:33:59 -0500 |
Hi Paul you said: I don't think of Omnimark as high-level. I think of it as ultra low-level. It is focused on the nuts and bolts of the text. Can you briefly describe what you mean by "low level and focused on the text". Is it lower level than XSL and if yes why. We can learn from your explanations. cheers Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Mi, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Mi, Paul Prescod |
RE: alternatives to XSL (was RE: Mi, Lawton, Scott | Date | Re: Microsoft extensions to XSL (w, Ray Cromwell |
Month |