Subject: Re: XQL + XSL = Better (kinda like scripting) From: Paul Prescod <papresco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:33:54 -0600 |
Andrew Bunner wrote: > > I don't know how many other people have seen this, but I found this > (http://www.w3.org/TandS/QL/QL98/pp/xql.html) presentation on XQL. XQL is > (predictably) XML Query Language and it's only a proposal right now, but.... > >... > Does this sound useful to anyone else? Several of us have argued that there should be a standard query language for XSL, XPointer and other XML use. I haven't examined XQL closely, but it would be one contender. -- Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco At today's pop doubling rates, in 100 years there will be 20 billion people, more than enough to fill the earth. In 300 years, we will have filled up 16 earth-sized planets (roughly, our solar system). In 2300 years we will have filled up 200 billion earth-sized planets (roughly, our galaxy). Only one technology can save us: birth control. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XQL + XSL = Better (kinda like scri, Andrew Bunner | Thread | Re: XQL + XSL = Better (kinda like , Paul Prescod |
Re: XQL + XSL = Better, Flow Simulation | Date | Re: XQL + XSL = Better (kinda like , Paul Prescod |
Month |