Subject: Re: The original purpose of XSL... From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 13:08:22 GMT |
> The primary uptake of > XSL has to be in the production of renderable data within the Web browser. > Anything else that it accomplishes is great, but if it fails in this > purpose, people are going to feel more than a little let down. Since I suppose I am one of the guilty parties who have dragged tex and dsssl in to the discussion, let me say that I agree totally with the above comment. Although while _designing_ the language I would argue that you should aim for a wider stage, when it comes down to final choices you may have to trim some of the more exotic aspects for technical or political reasons, but that is not a reason for starting off looking at the wider picture. Apart from anything else, given the rate at which web browsing technology improves, if you design a language aimed at todays web browsers, and intentionally omit features that are `only' needed by `high end' print applications, you may find the language is not powerful enough to control the web browsers that are in distribution by the time the style language gets implemented. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
The original purpose of XSL..., Guy_Murphy | Thread | Re: The original purpose of XSL..., Guy_Murphy |
Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Oren Ben-Kiki | Date | Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , John E. Simpson |
Month |