Subject: Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent survey] From: Daniel Glazman <Daniel.Glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 02:47:43 +0100 |
A very short message in the dozens of pages sent in this thread... [ when do you work ?-] Just one point : it seems to me that the Netscape Action Sheets proposal [1] can do very powerful transformations of a XML instance if associated to the DOM. Ok, it's only partially declarative. And It is so powerful I don't mind. selectors + events + ECMAscript + DOM = do what you want ***any time you want***. [1] + Simple Tree Transformation Sheets (STTS) [2] + Microsoft behaviors (pronounce HTML components !) [3] are a remarkably coherent and powerful set for any transformation of any kind. Oren, I guess you can determine my answers to your survey ;-) [1] http://www.w3.org/Submission/1998/10/ [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/1998/19/ [3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/1998/17/ </Daniel> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Chris Maden | Thread | Re: why split? [was RE: XSL intent , Guy_Murphy |
Re: ANN: TeXML enables transform fo, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: Stepping back, for a moment..., David Carlisle |
Month |