Subject: Re: Stepping back, part two... From: Guy_Murphy@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 10:21:30 +0000 |
Fair comment on the raspberry, I did invite it :) As for print consideration starting the XSL effort, you may well be right, I genuinely am ignorant in this matter... can you back this up? It comes as a great suprise to me that XSL is a print and not Web driven style language, and if this is the W3Cs stated intent, they'd do well to let the Web development community know. Cheers Guy. xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/29/98 12:40:33 AM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc: (bcc: Guy Murphy/UK/MAID) Subject: Re: Stepping back, part two... [SNIP] My childish response to this is a big fat raspberry. Print considerations *started* the XSL effort; attempts to limit its scope to HTML transformation are closer to hijacking than are attempts to keep to its original mission. [SNIP] XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Stepping back, part two..., Chris Maden | Thread | Re: Stepping back, part two..., Sebastian Rahtz |
Re: XSL intent survey, Daniel Glazman | Date | Re: XSL intent survey, Guy_Murphy |
Month |