Subject: RE: The XSL-List Digest V1 #228 From: "Freed, Erik" <freed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 10:28:30 -0800 |
I would like to respond to Ed Nixon who I think is right on when he says: >On another level, it may be that those with a professional stake -- and that >seems to be a very wide spectrum of interests -- in what is happening in W3C >just want them to get on with it and get it finished...in a way that all of the >money bags consortium members find mutually agreeable. In a way that allows for >some consensus, rather than replicating or promulgating their marketing >department/MBA-style wet dreams of success. I am one of those who is using XSL for a product that I am hoping to have see the light of day as soon as possible. (That is why I do not usually post to this list). I see what W3/MS has in place as being acceptable for my product, perhaps even overkill, and am just scared that somewhere in the merger of the DOJ with anti-MS forces, XSL will become a complex battlefield instead of what really succeeds in this world: a 'good-enough', available, and high quality product. Keep it simple! just my thoughts, erik XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
XSL now, and no excuses!, David RR Webber | Thread | |
XSL now, and no excuses!, David RR Webber | Date | |
Month |