Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:09:53 +0000 (GMT) |
Chris Lilley writes: > procedural and declarative. Personally I would far rather use a site > that provided document-style XML and CSS, rather than some site which > provided crappy table-based HTML "formatting"; knowing that somewhere on > the server (but not available to look at) was XML source and and XSL > stylesheet would not give me warm fuzzies. It might as well be an Oracle do remember that on occasion this may be exactly what the provider intends. I don't _want_ you to see my structure, and my richness, I want you to see purely a presentation, so that I can charge you separately/more for the rich XML. yes, OK, I could transform the XML to Voyager XML and strip out the richness. just a thought - protecting the source and stylesheet may be a design choice. Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Chris Lilley | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Paul Prescod |
CSS, XSL & "Religious Schisms" (RE:, Laurie Mann | Date | Re: syntax feedback, keshlam |
Month |