Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Toivo Lainevool <tlainevool@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 05:13:38 -0800 (PST) |
---James Tauber <jtauber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Basicaly, the popular choice was to use the transformational part of XSL > >(dare I call it XQL? :-) to convert XML into CSS+XML/HTML. > > What are we supposed to do about serious print applications? What are we > supposed to do about footnotes, page references, dictionary-style headers, > synchronised marginalia or bi-directional text? > Isn't SGML/DSSSL for the serious print applications? I thought XML/XSL was supposed to be "SGML Lite". SGML/DSSSL can be used for the "serious" people and XML/XSL will be for the masses. Toivo Lainevool tlainevool@xxxxxxx _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Tony Graham |
Re: syntax feedback, Sebastian Rahtz | Date | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Toivo Lainevool |
Month |