Subject: Re: alternating tags in a list? From: Ray Cromwell <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 15:58:17 -0500 (EST) |
I don't see the big deal about allowing script code to be evaluated via XSL. If the XSL-WG isn't willing to add the neccessary features to XSL to make it useful for most web developers, what's the point? You're suggesting that if XSL can't handle a particular query, that someone post process with DOM+script. But processing nodes via DOM in a language like Java is painful. Lots of getElementsByThisOrThat, followed by for/while loops, following by accessor calls to Attributes trying to perform a match. In other words, the irritating, non-concise, bug-probable code, that should be handled by a nice tailor made language using a standard matching engine. XSL could alleviate most of this work by allowing script-coders to use a "Visitor Pattern" where XSL visits the nodes, and the script code gets ran on each node in the query. I used to think I understood what XSL was, what it was going to do for me, but now I'm not so sure. I thought it was about style, and rendering XML documents on the web. But apparently, that changed. Now it seems it should be called XTL (extensible transformation language), since now most of the talk is about transformation. But it doesn't seem to be great for transformation either if it can't do simple thinks like an even-odd rule. What is it, a style language or a transformation language? It doesn't seem to do either thing particularly well right now. To top it off, there seems to be a resistence on the part of some people to either 1) add the appropriate power to the matching language or 2) temporarily break out to script code. I think this is naive. It is obvious to me that XSL lacks the power to do a lot of common web formatting cases that is now handled by ASP code. This means there will be a huge web developer demand for this functionality, and commercial companies *will* add it to the language. It's not a question of *if*, but when. Of course, there will be many incompatibilities between these extensions, with one company mostly dominating (likely MS) as a defacto standard, and finally, the W3C will be forced to bite the bullet and declare the extensions part of the standard. -Ray XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: alternating tags in a list?, Paul Prescod | Thread | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Guy_Murphy |
RE: syntax feedback, Reynolds, Gregg | Date | Re: alternating tags in a list?, Ray Cromwell |
Month |