Subject: Re: syntax feedback From: Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:37:41 +0100 |
Oren Ben-Kiki wrote: > > Chris Lilley <chris@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Daniel GLAZMAN <daniel.glazman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Yeah... So why does XSL reinvent the wheel and not reuse CSS > >> > selectors' syntax ? > >Either way, you need to parse the attributes specially. > > My understanding of Daniel's position - and I may be wrong - is that the CSS > syntax be adopted in more then just the pattern language (witness STTS, for > example). STTS does use the CSS "pattern" (selector) syntax. > If it was just the pattern language, it wouldn't have been much of > an argument :-) I don't understand your point, sinc ehtat is exactly what STTS uses; unless you are one of those folks who seem to think that CSS selectors are limited to a single GI? In which case the advise would be to go read the spec. -- Chris XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: syntax feedback, Oren Ben-Kiki | Thread | Re: syntax feedback, Daniel Glazman |
Re: alternating tags in a list?, Paul Prescod | Date | Inline scripting, Paul Prescod |
Month |